You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DeVliegendeHollander comments on Michael Oakeshott's critique of something-he-called-rationalism - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 [deleted] 24 March 2015 09:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 March 2015 07:21:25AM 0 points [-]

You should have a high prior that a belief that you can be "strong" is Dunning-Kruger talking.

Okay, but feeling no passion, literally, no blood pressure rising isn't a strong evidence there with few false positives? Does it have many false positives?

Sandboxing is okay, better than total taboo, this is why I recommended a quarantine. Or a biweekly thread.