A rule whereby you do not kill people without their consent is much easier to implement, and results in many fewer bad consequences (including perverse incentives), than a rule whereby you do not refuse to give people a million dollars without their consent.
I'm not talking about a general rule against killing, I'm talking killing this particular guy named Joe, who's really annoying me.
Link to Blog Post: "Extremism in Thought Experiments is No Vice"
_____
_____
This is a LW discussion post for Yvain's blog posts at Slate Star Codex, as per tog's suggestion:
Scott/Yvain's permission to repost on LW was granted (from facebook):