No, when a moral realist says his beliefs are better, he means they are better because they are true.
Under moral realism morality is like physics -- that's just how the universe is constructed and the criterion for truth is matching the territory (reality for physics and God's will for Christianity).
In this system, do morals have a separate status from other divine commandments and laws? What is the definition of the category "morals", if the only way to discover them is to study divine revelation, and not by introspection?
Link to Blog Post: "Extremism in Thought Experiments is No Vice"
_____
_____
This is a LW discussion post for Yvain's blog posts at Slate Star Codex, as per tog's suggestion:
Scott/Yvain's permission to repost on LW was granted (from facebook):