You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

IlyaShpitser comments on LW's take on nutrition? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: michael_b 03 April 2015 12:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 03 April 2015 07:07:59AM *  3 points [-]

(6.) The natural world can be complicated, and scientists have limited tools to investigate and a lot of incentive to oversell.

It is difficult to arrange RCTs for nutrition -- and so you must be very careful. My advice is to engage with their actual citations.

Comment author: michael_b 05 April 2015 11:16:18AM 0 points [-]

(6.) The natural world can be complicated, and scientists have limited tools to investigate and a lot of incentive to oversell.

Agree that the world is complicated. Could you go into more detail about incentive to oversell? Do you mean they need to promise groundbreaking results to close funding?

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 05 April 2015 11:52:28AM 0 points [-]

Scientists have to market themselves to earn kudos in their field, and get grant money. This isn't bad in and of itself, but there are usual marketing incentives here.