You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

V_V comments on Futarchy and Unfriendly AI - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: jkaufman 03 April 2015 09:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: V_V 04 April 2015 12:37:11PM 1 point [-]

I'm not a big fan of decision making by conditional prediction markets (btw, "futarchy" is an obscure, non-descriptive name. Better call it something like "prophetocracy"), but I think that proponents like Robin Hanson propose that the value system is not set once and for all but regularly updated by a democratically elected government. This should avoid the failure mode you are talking about.

Comment author: jkaufman 06 April 2015 12:49:22PM 2 points [-]

"Futarchy" is an obscure, non-descriptive name. Better call it something like "prophetocracy"

"Futarchy" is the standard term for this governmental system. Perhaps Hanson should have chosen a different name, but that's the name its been going under for about a decade and I don't think "prophetocracy" would be an improvement.

Comment author: V_V 06 April 2015 10:04:40PM 0 points [-]

It's not a very well know word, anyway. Would the cost of changing it outweigh the benefit of a relatively self-descriptive word?