You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Val comments on In what language should we define the utility function of a friendly AI? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Val 05 April 2015 10:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Val 05 April 2015 11:23:35PM 0 points [-]

I agree, however I still think that because programming languages were developed and optimized for a different purpose than defining utility functions for AIs, there might be other languages somewhat better suited for the job.

If this line of thinking proves to be a dead end, I would remove some parts of the article and focus on the "changing values" aspect, as this is an issue I don't remember seeing in the FAI debate.