= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ChristianKl comments on In what language should we define the utility function of a friendly AI? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (22)
Language development seems to me an integral part of building an AGI. The AGI has to reason over concepts and needs to represent them in some way.
Languages like CycL or common logic, are likely to be nearer to what you are seeking then natlangs.