You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on In what language should we define the utility function of a friendly AI? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Val 05 April 2015 10:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 April 2015 01:17:01PM 1 point [-]

Language exists for communicating something. Here the question is how a person communicates that they love another person.

Comment author: Val 07 April 2015 01:25:34PM 0 points [-]

Indeed. If I remember correctly, the author was a relationship/marriage counselor and he witnessed many failing relationships where the partners really loved each other, they just didn't use the right channels to express it to each other. By saying that different people have different ways how they can best express (and best receive/understand/accept) love, and if they don't understand what kind of love the other one needs (and can understand) the most, it's like not knowing the language of each other, it's not too far-fetched to use the word "language" in this context.