You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

knb comments on What are "the really good ideas" that Peter Thiel says are too dangerous to mention? - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: James_Miller 12 April 2015 09:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: knb 14 April 2015 12:45:20AM 0 points [-]

Regarding NASA and research suppression, I have an extremely difficult time understanding what could draw you to that conclusion.

Don't misrepresent what I said. I did not state I had made a "conclusion." My reason for wondering about it is that NASA has devoted surprisingly few resources to advanced propulsion research. Something people have been complaining about for years. I think bureaucratic inertia and congressional meddling are more likely explanations, but there is no reason it has to be an either/or.

Comment author: ChristianKl 15 April 2015 10:57:11PM 0 points [-]

Another explanation would be that they consider advanced propulsion research military and therefore classified the research they do.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 15 April 2015 10:35:50PM 0 points [-]

Apologies for wording. Agreement on there being annoying issues that are cause for thought. On top of that I think it's clear they could even be doing more with the technologies they currently have.