You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Anti-Pascaline satisficer - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 14 April 2015 06:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (7)
Tags: agent satisficer pascal satisficing ai

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 14 April 2015 10:39:32PM 0 points [-]

Hasn't this been mentioned before, as satisficing on probability of object-level satisfaction?

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 17 April 2015 03:08:58PM 0 points [-]

Well, the agent design hasn't been mentioned before, but the idea seems plausible enough that an equivalent one could have been found.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit