You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open Thread, Apr. 27 - May 3, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gondolinian 27 April 2015 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (352)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 01 May 2015 01:49:53PM 1 point [-]

Ok, but if someone is subsidising successful revivals (which is what a prize on each one is), quality of the result will still matter.

No, a prize is a specific way to subsidize. In particular a subsidy based on goals set when the price is formulated. Having a foundation with a budget to invest into reviving people makes more sense if you care about quality.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 02 May 2015 07:37:12AM 0 points [-]

No, a prize is a specific way to subsidize. In particular a subsidy based on goals set when the price is formulated.

There's nothing to stop the foundation paying it from raising its standards over time.

People -- at least, the ones sharing the transhumanist worldview -- want revival. The people who work on revival want revival. Revival is the goal, not a few piddling millions or billions of dollars. Industrial-scale revival won't happen until people are satisfied that it really is revival; then and not before will that huge market exist. When prizes are involved, you're looking at early-stage technology, whose only reason for existing is to become mature technology.