You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

brainmaps comments on Shawn Mikula on Brain Preservation Protocols and Extensions - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: oge 29 April 2015 02:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: brainmaps 06 May 2015 06:00:06PM *  2 points [-]

Neurons perform analog summation, so the space-time diagram or causal structure is stochastic/statistical rather than deterministic

Surely you realize that quibbling over the use of analog vs digital neural summation in my toy example does not address my main argument.

Neural analog computational systems can be simulated perfectly in a probabilistic sense

Anything can be simulated perfectly (and trivially) in a probabilistic sense.

There are no objective tests for consciousness. Of course you can re-define it in terms of self-awareness but this is not the same.

A definition of consciousness which precludes objective testing is outside the realm of scientific inquiry at best, and pseudo-science at worse.

If we knew the basis for consciousness, we would have objective tests. It's possible that studying the brain's structural and connectional organization in detail will provide the clues we need to develop better informed opinions about the basis of consciousness.

This is my final post and I would like to thank everyone for the discussion. If anyone is interested in developing autotracing and autosegmentation programs for connectomics and neural circuit reconstruction in whole-brain volume electron microscopy datasets, please email me at brainmaps at gmail dot com or visit http://connectomes.org for more information. Thanks again.