You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on When does technological enhancement feel natural and acceptable? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 01 May 2015 09:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 01 May 2015 09:52:16PM 3 points [-]

Which enhancements would you like? "Yes" doesn't mean "always" but "as needed". Choose "Other" if unsure, if you see other choices you want to comment on or if you just want to see the answers.

Virtual clones

Real clones

Independent clones

Think faster

Think slower

Perfect memory

Conscious access to numeric computing ressources (arithmetic, statistics)

Conscious access to symbolic computing ressources (logic)

Conscious access to turing complete computing ressources

Recall of information from the web like own memory

Conscious control over habit formation

Affect emotional states in a controlled way (happiness, attention, fear...)

Alter my mind in deeper ways

Move my mind into or expand my mind to vehicles or other bodies

Perceive radiation natively

Perceive material properties natively

Act via tactile control of audiovisual devices

Act via tactile control with feedback via augmented senses

Act via linguistic control of audiovisual devices

Act via linguistic control with feedback via augmented senses

Act via conscious thought control of audiovisual devices

Act via conscious thought with feedback via augmented senses

Interact with artificial beings

Interact with artificial beings that are smarter than I

Interact with artificial beings that are less smart than I

Interact with artificial beings that are more powerful than I

Have (parallel) consciousness which runs at time-scales of societal change

Conscious access to slow processes

Be consciously aware of cost-benefit trade-offs any application or usage of the above enhancements brings

You may add other polls as sub comments.

Submitting...

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 02 May 2015 01:36:15PM 3 points [-]

I want to be able to reverse aging.

What would the use be of thinking slower? Maybe for boring times?

I don't just want conscious recall of information from web-like own memory, I want to be able to communicate (both receive and transmit) directly in hypertext-- I don't know what it would be like, but it's frustrating that I can't.

If I could alter my mind in deeper ways, I'd like really good version control. I'd also like to be able to toggle between sensory extension and old-style sensory systems-- there's a lot of art which is optimized for currently standard senses.

And I'd like self-modules., so that if I wanted to experience something as though it was new to me or as if I were at an earlier age, I could. Daniel Pinkwater (a notable author of children's books) has mentioned that he has access to what it's like to be various ages.

Comment author: lululu 28 May 2015 08:27:56PM 1 point [-]

I think people are SEVERELY overestimating the utility of perfect memory (74% yes, 10% no), and underestimating the value of traumatic and unpleasant experiences fading over time. Some people currently have perfect memory, it is not a good experience.

A better selective memory is a good thing. Electing to remember where you placed your keys or the name of your mailman is a good idea. Having perfect memory of all the idiotic things you said or did during your first break up or that fight with your mom, or more importantly that time you were molested or almost died in combat is a recipe for emotional disaster and severe PTSD. Its very hard to control where your mind dwells and how memories are triggered, but slow fade and nostalgic filters protect us from the worst emotional damage of long-term rumination over negative events.

In addition to good memories, every angry word, every mistake, every disappointment, every shock and every moment of pain goes unforgotten. Time heals no wounds for Price. "I don't look back at the past with any distance. It's more like experiencing everything over and over again, and those memories trigger exactly the same emotions in me. It's like an endless, chaotic film that can completely overpower me. And there's no stop button."

She's constantly bombarded with fragments of memories, exposed to an automatic and uncontrollable process that behaves like an infinite loop in a computer. Sometimes there are external triggers, like a certain smell, song or word. But often her memories return by themselves. Beautiful, horrific, important or banal scenes rush across her wildly chaotic "internal monitor," sometimes displacing the present. "All of this is incredibly exhausting," says Price.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-science-of-memory-an-infinite-loop-in-the-brain-a-591972.html

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 28 May 2015 09:58:03PM 1 point [-]

Insightful. But that really 'only' means that these transhumanists just want conscious access to the availability of the memory too.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 05 May 2015 02:14:22PM 1 point [-]

Summary of results: we want everything.

Comment author: DanielLC 03 May 2015 04:24:22AM 1 point [-]

What's the difference between "die when I want" and "immortality"? I would expect "die when I want" would mean that I keep living until I decide to die, and "immortality" would mean that I keep living, but I could totally change my mind if I want to. I'm fine with clones if we can recombine, but if we can't it would be disconcerting.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 05 May 2015 12:41:57PM 0 points [-]

Lots of people have voted "other" - but not always (show results) so I wonder: What other options there are hidden?