= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
SanguineEmpiricist comments on Open Thread, May 4 - May 10, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (215)
The case is made over twin studies. If you believe that parents equally try to get all their children hooked on reading, it's factored in.
You assume that the people here wouldn't have getting hooked on reading if their parents didn't encourage reading.
It's too far against nurture. This is pushing against the limit for hard reductionism there are definitely non-genetic emergent effects while maintaining the absolute good taste of genetic arguments.