You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dentin comments on The Mr. Hyde of Oxytocin - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: theowl 10 May 2015 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Dentin 10 May 2015 03:11:54PM 1 point [-]

FYI, my solution to my trust issues has been to accept them, and attack the other side of the trust coin: I remain as untrusting as before, I simply care less about the failure modes.

For me personally, this makes things a lot more entertaining. It becomes a game of seeing if I can predict if someone is going to violate my trust or not - I trust them with something trivial and unimportant to see what will happen. I expect and anticipate failure a lot of the time from my lab rats, and am usually pleasantly surprised when I don't get it.

Over time I build up models of the people I can trust in various ways, but even with the best of them it winds up looking like airport landing times: even the most reliable route fails fairly often, but as long as it doesn't cause cascading effects that's ok.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 11 May 2015 01:45:52AM *  0 points [-]

With the job interview, it's more of a one shot deal. Any solution for that scenario?

I simply care less about the failure modes.

The trouble is I want to be more trusting and open exactly in those instances when I care more about the outcome, when something significant is on the line.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 11 May 2015 01:47:35PM 2 points [-]

Practice when it doesn't matter so that it comes as second nature when it does.