You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open Thread, May 11 - May 17, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gondolinian 11 May 2015 12:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (247)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 May 2015 02:32:01PM 0 points [-]

I think if we follows this chain of questions, what we'll find at the end (except for turtles, of course) is the question "Why is the universe stable/regular instead of utterly chaotic?" A similar question is "Why does the universe even have negentropy?"

I don't know any answer to these questions except for "That's what our universe is".

Comment author: SolveIt 12 May 2015 02:38:40PM 1 point [-]

I suppose what I want to know is the answer to "What features of our universe make it possible for entities to learn?".

Which sounds remarkably similar to DeVliegendeHollander's question, perhaps with an implicit assumption that learning won't be present in many (most?) universes.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 May 2015 04:24:14PM 1 point [-]

The fact that the universe is stable/regular enough to be predictable. Subject predictability is a necessary requirement for learning.