You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

sixes_and_sevens comments on Wild Moral Dilemmas - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: sixes_and_sevens 12 May 2015 12:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (106)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 12 May 2015 04:11:40PM 1 point [-]

I think we're talking past each other here. I'm not talking about how to cooperate with anybody, or how to cooperate in a value-hostile social environment. I'm talking about how I can cooperate with people I want to cooperate with.

Comment author: Jiro 12 May 2015 05:29:50PM -1 points [-]

I'm talking about that too. For slightly different values of "you", where "you" want to cooperate with fellow religious believers because you think they are more likely to share your desires and values.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 12 May 2015 05:45:58PM 0 points [-]

Well if we're talking about that version of "me", why not talk about the version of "me" who's a member of the International Dog-Kicking Association? For any given virtue you can posit some social context were that virtue is or is not desirable. I'm not sure what that accomplishes.

Comment author: Jiro 12 May 2015 05:56:15PM *  1 point [-]

The International Dog-Kicking Association is something you just made up, so the fact that a rule fails when applied to it doesn't mean the rule will cause any problems in real life. Religion actually exists.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 12 May 2015 07:27:50PM *  1 point [-]

I really don't know what we're actually disagreeing about here, so I'm going to tap out. Have a nice evening.

(If it's not evening where you are yet, then have a tolerable rest of the day, and then have a nice evening)