You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Creutzer comments on Wild Moral Dilemmas - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: sixes_and_sevens 12 May 2015 12:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (106)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Creutzer 13 May 2015 08:01:07AM 0 points [-]

<blockquote>I cinsider the importance to me of a truth or a bond then I make my choice.</blockquote>

How does this count as a <i>moral</i> decision?

Comment author: [deleted] 14 May 2015 01:01:17PM 1 point [-]

The moral choice is indicated by a question mark in the sentence prior to the one you quote. The sentence you quote is my resolution process. The final sentence is the outcome.

Comment author: Creutzer 18 May 2015 07:12:34PM 0 points [-]

I still don't see why this is supposed to be moral reasoning. It's just about the importance of things to you. To me it looks like just as much of a moral decision as your decision to have toast for breakfast or not.