To have a productive discussion it's worthwhile to be able to clarify which political decisions one agrees with and which one accepts.
Do you think that the law itself is reasonable and it's just the judge who's the problem?
In practice, there is no "the law" which is separate from a judge's decisions, so that's a meaningless question.
Over at Scott Adams' Blog you can find a very fine example of using the 'Rationality Engine' to solve the social problem of assisted dying.