You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

skeptical_lurker comments on How to come to a rational believe about whether someone has a crush on yo - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 [deleted] 14 May 2015 12:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 14 May 2015 01:41:53PM 2 points [-]

If you aren't good at reading other people's signals, then the following heuristic is a pretty good one:

If you like A, and you are wondering whether A likes you, the answer is no. If you don't like A, and you are wondering whether A likes you, the answer is yes.

So, whatever you want, the other person wants the opposite? That's an awful heuristic! Remember, reverse stupidity is not intellegence!

Comment author: Salemicus 14 May 2015 03:47:24PM 4 points [-]

So, whatever you want, the other person wants the opposite?

Nope. The rule is conditional on "wondering." For the vast majority of people I meet, it doesn't occur to me to wonder whether they have a crush on me. So if I'm wondering whether they like me, something unusual must have triggered it.

Similarly, if I like someone and they like me too, most of the time I don't wonder about it, I know. So if I'm still puzzled as to whether they like me, then it's because they don't like me, but I'm trying to read non-signals as signals.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 14 May 2015 04:46:23PM 4 points [-]

Similarly, if I like someone and they like me too, most of the time I don't wonder about it, I know. So if I'm still puzzled as to whether they like me, then it's because they don't like me, but I'm trying to read non-signals as signals.

Maybe you're overoptimistic, and try to "read non-signals as signals" but other people might be under-confident and not see signals which are there because they have difficulty imagining that someone could like them.

Of course, if you are even remotely credence calibrated in this matter, then uncertainty signifies ... uncertainty.