You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

John_Maxwell_IV comments on We Should Introduce Ourselves Differently - Less Wrong Discussion

54 Post author: NancyLebovitz 18 May 2015 08:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 21 May 2015 12:50:42PM *  0 points [-]

I think the value of attracting users to LW has a power law distribution. Both Luke Muehlhauser and Nate Soares were "discovered" through their writing for LW, and both went on to be MIRI's executive director. I think the core target audience for LW should be extremely intelligent people who, for one reason or another, haven't managed to find an IRL cluster of other extremely intelligent people to be friends with. (Obviously I welcome math grad students at Caltech who want to contribute, but I think they'll be substantially less motivated to find a community than someone of equivalent intellectual caliber who decided school was bullshit and dropped out at 17.)

Given that, I think LW's marketing should be optimized for very smart people with finely tuned bullshit detectors who may be relatively uneducated but are probably budding autodidacts. (That's part of the reason I added prominent links to the best textbooks thread/Anki when I wrote the about page.)

Comment author: Lumifer 21 May 2015 02:51:33PM 1 point [-]

I think LW's marketing should be optimized for very smart people with finely tuned bullshit detectors who may be relatively uneducated but are probably budding autodidacts.

That sounds like an excellent approach.

However it will make unhappy a bunch of people here who want to carry the torch of rationality into the masses and start raising waterlines :-/