You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Error comments on What Would You Do If You Only Had Six Months To Live? - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Sable 20 May 2015 12:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Error 21 May 2015 01:32:15AM 1 point [-]

Now pretend that the kindly old doctor has shuffled into the room, blinking as he shuffles a few papers. "I'm very sorry," he says, "But you've only got about 70 years to live..."

I don't think these are comparable. In particular, the person with six months to live has something the person with seventy lacks: A comparative advantage over the rest of the population with respect to risk. That is, risky actions cost them less.

So my answer to "six months" is: Do things that were "off your list" only because they involved greater personal risk than you were willing to accept. That applies whether you prefer a life of hedonism, utilitarianism, or a mix of both. Go skydiving and also assassinate Hitler (for arbitrary values of Hitler). But your preference for hedonism-vs-helping-the-world shouldn't necessarily change.