You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

OrphanWilde comments on A Challenge: Maps We Take For Granted - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Sable 29 May 2015 03:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 01 June 2015 07:49:58PM 3 points [-]

Take a bit more ancient example: the Greek phalanx. It was considered to be an excellent formation for quite a long time, and yet the way to beat it turned out to be trivial: use highly mobile light slingers to harass the unwieldy phalanx until it falls apart. If you happen to know that, you could be a very helpful adviser to a Greek (or Persian :-D) general a century or two earlier.

Peltasts were commonplace in Greek warfare; they didn't displace the phalanx, or prove the phalanx's weakness, they supported the phalanx formations. This is the issue; war is considerably more complex than a "Formation X beats formation Y" equation. Roman legions continued using variants of phalanx formations centuries after the Greek and Persian war.

That said, there is technology that could be brought back to revolutionize warfare: Logistics. Modern statistical methodologies would be an incredible asset. But being the guy calculating how much food to bring and when to send deliveries isn't as exciting.