You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

anon85 comments on Approximating Solomonoff Induction - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Houshalter 29 May 2015 12:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: anon85 03 June 2015 03:26:03AM 2 points [-]

PAC-learning has no concept of prior or even of likelihood, and it allows you to learn regardless. If by "Bayesianism" you mean "learning", then sure, PAC-learning is a type of Bayesianism. But I don't see why it's useful to view it that way (Bayes's rule is never used, for example).