You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Approximating Solomonoff Induction - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Houshalter 29 May 2015 12:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Houshalter 03 June 2015 04:28:14AM 0 points [-]

It's deeper than that. Bayesian probability theory is a mathematical law. Anything method that works must be computing an approximation of it. Just like Newtonian mechanics is a very close approximation of relativity. But they are not equivalent.

Comment author: Lumifer 03 June 2015 02:47:34PM 2 points [-]

Bayesian probability theory is a mathematical law.

That is not true. The Bayes equation is mathematically correct. A theory is much wider -- for example, Bayesians interpret probability as a degree of belief -- is that also a mathematical law? You need a prior to start -- what does the "mathematical law" say about priors?