You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Bikura comments on How do humans assign utilities to world states? - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Dorikka 31 May 2015 08:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 01 June 2015 05:44:18PM 4 points [-]

Humans don't. "Utility" is part of the map, not part of the territory. We make choices, but utility theory is only a modeling language used to describe choice-making processes.

One are of research you may want to investigate is "Revealed Preference", a concept developed primarily by Paul Samuelson.

"Revealed Preference" has issues, because of things like circular preferences - although it's a mistake to conclude that circular preferences are proof that humans are irrational. Rather, it demonstrates that utility theory in general is just a model, and an incomplete one.

The fundamental issue is that utility, as a model, attempts to compress a topography of many dimensions - human preferences - into a topography of exactly one - a utility value for each potential choice. Impossible Objects - "contradictions", such as circular preferences - are to be expected in the abbreviated topography.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 June 2015 12:30:49AM *  0 points [-]

Why is self-reference expected when reducing the dimensions? Is it because these dimensions might influence each other in a circular way?

Comment author: OrphanWilde 08 June 2015 01:51:17PM -2 points [-]

Circles are valid two-dimensional objects. What mapping do you use to represent a circle in one dimension?