You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

eli_sennesh comments on Taking Effective Altruism Seriously - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Salemicus 07 June 2015 06:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (122)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 June 2015 10:38:50PM *  1 point [-]

However, if investment in capital is foregone consumption, then consumption is foregone investment. If I invest in the stock market today (altruistic), then in ten years' time spend my profits on a bigger house (selfish), then some of the good is undone. So the true altruist will not merely create capital, he will make sure that capital will never get spent down. One good way of doing that would be to donate to an institution likely to hold onto its capital in perpetuity, and likely to grow that capital over time. Perhaps the best example of such an institution would be a richly-endowed private university, such as Harvard, which has existed for almost 400 years and is said to have an endowment of $32 billion.

Capital that goes unspent forever is a meaningless piece of paper, or eventually, just constitutes power over other people. In the limit, an economy which has most of its productive power tied up as liquid capital undergoes a deflationary collapse due to general-glut conditions.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 June 2015 01:01:29PM 3 points [-]

Capital that goes unspent forever is a meaningless piece of paper, or eventually, just constitutes power over other people.

If I invest money into a startup and make a return of my investment I keep my capital but the investment isn't meaningless.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 June 2015 06:58:20PM 0 points [-]

That wasn't unspent. It was, somewhere down the line, manifested as actual commodities (ie: whatever the "startup" actually makes).

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 June 2015 11:58:43AM 1 point [-]

Harvard doesn't put his money in the mattress, they invest it. If you count invested money as spent, than they spend it.