You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

John_Maxwell_IV comments on [link] Baidu cheats in an AI contest in order to gain a 0.24% advantage - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Wei_Dai 06 June 2015 06:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 06 June 2015 12:09:39PM *  6 points [-]

The problem I see here is that the mainstream AI / machine learning community measures progress mainly by this kind of contest.

Yup, two big chapters of my book is about how terrible the evaluation systems of mainstream CV and NLP are. Instead of image classification (or whatever), researchers should write programs to do lossless compression of large image databases. This metric is absolutely ungameable, and also more meaningful.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 07 June 2015 11:34:52AM -1 points [-]

It seems like if anything, we should encourage researchers to focus on gameable metrics to slow progress on AGI?

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 14 June 2015 03:05:40PM 1 point [-]

If you really believe that slowing progress on AGI is a good thing, you should do it by encouraging young people to go into different fields, not by encouraging people to waste their careers.