You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

philh comments on Lesswrong, Effective Altruism Forum and Slate Star Codex: Harm Reduction - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: diegocaleiro 08 June 2015 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 June 2015 06:56:05PM 3 points [-]

maybe one factor is comments that are bad because they're wrong, and comments that are bad because they're right but, really, who cares?

So, nit-picking? Yes, it's popular on LW :-/ but (a) you are still free to ignore those; and (b) as opposed to the example with the cop, there is no inherent power imbalance. Nothing prevents you from going meta and pointing out the difference between what is important and what is not.

Do I read you right in that you want more co-travelers in figuring out problems and solutions and less critics who carefully examine your text for minor flaws and gotchas, basically?

Comment author: philh 10 June 2015 02:26:43PM 1 point [-]

On reflection, I'm not sure that nitpicking is quite the problem that I'm pointing at, but I don't think I have a very good handle on what is. (I do think nitpicking is a problem.)

Maybe next time I have that feeling, I'll just post anyway and see what happens.