You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on When does heritable low fitness need to be explained? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: DanArmak 10 June 2015 12:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (146)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 June 2015 05:28:54PM 1 point [-]

So, are you basically saying that the current Western concept of a being gay is mostly the result of identity politics?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 June 2015 09:42:14PM 2 points [-]

If you want some more fun with the subject, check out Hanne Blank's Straight which argues that the identity of heterosexual is a fairly recent thing-- only about a century old, as I recall. Previously, people thought in terms of sexual behaviors, not identities.

Comment author: V_V 13 June 2015 10:36:19AM 2 points [-]

Obviously, the heterosexual identity can only exist in contrast to the homosexual identity. If a group of squid people suddenly appeared on earth, you could bet that a vertebrate identity would develop pretty fast.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 June 2015 02:52:14PM 1 point [-]

Obviously, the heterosexual identity can only exist in contrast to the homosexual identity

That may be obvious if you think about it, but I, at least, hadn't thought about it, and found it to be surprising. I'm willing to bet that I'm more typical on this point.