You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Username comments on Pattern-botching: when you forget you understand - Less Wrong Discussion

31 Post author: malcolmocean 15 June 2015 10:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Username 27 June 2015 10:41:19PM *  0 points [-]

So from a training wheels perspective, we might totally eradicate words like "should". I did this! It was really helpful. But once I had removed the word from my idiolect, it became unhelpful to still be treating it as being a touchy word. Then I heard my mentor use it, and I remembered that the point of removing the word wasn't to not ever use it, but to train my brain to think without a particular structure that "should" represented.

I tried this as well. I spent a year not using words like "should" and "fault". I then went back to using them when I started my full-time job because those words are too useful, and I regressed, at least partially, to my old way of thinking.

Old patterns come back if you're not careful. The training wheel metaphor is likely counterproductive here.

Comment author: malcolmocean 02 July 2015 08:14:32PM *  1 point [-]

Ahh, I think that the context shift was probably a huge issue. I mostly hang out with people who also eschew "should"—either my intentional community or people who read blog posts like these ones of Nate's:

"Should" considered harmful
Your "shoulds" are not a duty
Not because you "should"

I think the training wheel metaphor isn't perfect... it's maybe more like this bicycle.