You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

John_Maxwell_IV comments on Effectively Less Altruistically Wrong Codex - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: diegocaleiro 16 June 2015 07:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 18 June 2015 04:03:02PM *  1 point [-]

I perceive heavily diminishing returns to exercise past the first few hours of exercise a week, and to meditation past the first 15 minutes per day. For books, I would say it depends on the book. This short blog post has more insight in it than most of the books I read as a kid. Many of Paul Graham's essays would probably be book-length if they were written by a less exceptional writer. In general the best internet writing I read seems more insight-dense than the best book writing I read, but the best internet writing is scattered.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 June 2015 01:30:46AM 2 points [-]

Wow, I would say in general the book reading i've done has been far more fruitful than the internet reading I've done - the signal to noise ratio in an individual post might be higher, but the signal to noise ratio of finding good content is much much higher for online (IME) - additionally, I think the real issue here is the return of posting an article vs. reading a book, not of reading an article vs. reading a book.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 19 June 2015 06:51:27AM 2 points [-]

What are some of the best books you've read? I tend to be pretty disappointed with most books.

but the signal to noise ratio of finding good content is much much higher for online (IME)

Yeah, I think there is low-hanging fruit in assembling collections of great blog posts.

I think the real issue here is the return of posting an article vs. reading a book, not of reading an article vs. reading a book.

It's definitely relevant though because internet reading trades off against book reading for the people who will read your post. It's possible that there is some kind of power law distribution of post quality, and a small number of blog posts generate a large fraction of the value for readers. But it may be hard to predict how much value you will generate for your readers in advance--for example, I didn't predict this post would be as well-received as it was.