= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Lumifer comments on Effective altruism and political power - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (50)
He is also gay which kills his chances for the presidency even more effectively than being an atheist. Not to mention that he is not a native-born American citizen which disqualifies him right off the bat.
My response was directed more at the "most sane people" part.
Ah. In this case I concur -- I think that "most sane people are atheists" is... not quite true.
More people would vote for a gay candidate than an atheist:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155285/Atheists-Muslims-Bias-Presidential-Candidates.aspx
I could imagine that a gay candidate could run for the Democrats, but Theil is closer to the Republicans.
I'm not sure whether the numbers of that poll actually drive voting decisions. Are there estimates about how many percentage points Mitt Romney lost for being Mormon?
Hmm, interesting.
I find it hilarious that in terms of electability Muslims are smack in the middle between gays and atheists... X-D