You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

torekp comments on Michigan Meetup Feedback and Planning - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Zubon 18 June 2015 02:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (3)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: torekp 21 June 2015 04:44:21PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for organizing, Zubon. About points 5 and 6, combined: how about floating some topics or projects during the organizing posts announcing the meetup? If there are two or more proposals that have some popularity, we could have pre-defined subgroups. For example, AI and AI risk is a topic that a few people seemed especially interested in, and I would be interested in (though I have weak AI background knowledge).

Comment author: Zubon 23 June 2015 11:42:41PM 0 points [-]

Me, I'm comfortable having somewhat meandering discussions. One of our meetup best practices suggests that groups have more success (measured in terms of interest and retention) with a project or something specific to do rather than socialization. Maybe we cut in the middle of that with a discussion group rather than resembling a cocktail party. I am also concerned that having something that looks like a homework assignment would cut against our "all are welcome" goal.

So perhaps I could rephrase it as "what do you (general you) want from a meetup?" The link has some ideas that have worked nicely elsewhere.