You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Epictetus comments on High energy ethics and general moral relativity - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: maxikov 21 June 2015 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Epictetus 21 June 2015 11:58:24PM 1 point [-]

Utilitarianism is useful in a narrow range where we have a good utility function. The problem is easiest when the different options offer the same kind of utility. For example, if every option paid out in dollars or assets with a known dollar value, then utilitarianism provides a good solution.

But when it comes to harder problems, utilitarianism runs into trouble. The solution strongly depends on the initial choice of utility function. However, we have no apparatus to reliably measure utility. You can easily use utilitarianism to extend other moral systems by trying to devise a utility function that provides the appropriate conclusions in known cases. If I do this for Confucianism, I'm being as utilitarian as someone doing it for Enlightenment teachings.