You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on Cryonics: peace of mind vs. immortality - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: oge 24 June 2015 07:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Elo 25 June 2015 12:09:20AM 1 point [-]

The way that cryonics was explained to me that made reasonable sense:

On a scale of spreading ashes far and wide; to cooling down your atoms so they are not moving enough. How preserved is thing X. Where ashes are pretty much 0 = not preserved, and cryogenic freezing is 0.99 and more if cooler.

after preserving there is a much higher chance of recreating the preserved entity than after ash spreading. if you believe the chance that medical and recovery technology will be able to revive a preserved entity to be non-zero; you should partake in cryonics for a future N. Where N may be as long as it takes to wait till your revival.

The major questions: * where does consciousness come from; and can we give it to back an entity that died? (while I don't doubt we can answer that eventually; the answer might come in the form of "yes but its far too difficult and expensive") * if for example we 3d print a brain that entirely matches a cryonically preserved entity; then link it up to a body, will it be possible to impart consciousness to it? * is it actually possible to measure the state of a preserved entity without destroying it? * can we recreate a preserved entity from the knowledge of where the atoms in its brain were? * will it ever be possible to do so? (as you get closer and closer to perfect recreation; it probably gets harder and harder to do)

I am not enrolled in cryonics, but have nothing against people taking the bet.