In my experience, as long as people are young say <25 something as simple, easy and straightforward as body-building fixes it. 30+ that gets harder because one has less energy, less time, less desire for doing stuff like this, at least in my case, as my dad used to say "too old for being a clown now", but at 20 or so any guy with a broad chest is going to get indicators of interest.

Ah, I was wondering when your particular style of trainwreck commentary would grace this thread...

A positive thing I can say about the originator of the thread is he is not coming at the question from an attitude of entitlement. I encourage him to keep that up.

Do you have figures for the relative interest among sexologists in people with "normal desires" versus those you charmingly call "LGBT dysfunctionals"?

I am not by any stretch an expert in sexology, but it seems to me that sexologists shouldn't be studying people who have no partners and aren't having any sex any more than podiatrists should be studying people with no feet. (That doesn't mean that those people shouldn't be studied; it means that sexologists aren't the people to do the studying, because those people's difficulties occur before any sort of sex gets started. It's an issue for psychologists or sociologists, I'd have thought. Similarly, footlessness and its causes would be a proper object of study for specialists in industrial accidents, congenital malformations, etc.)

the solution would be to be aware of a trend and avoid it. Right?