You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open Thread, Jun. 29 - Jul. 5, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Gondolinian 29 June 2015 12:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (210)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 02 July 2015 09:14:39PM 0 points [-]

Are you aware of the phrase "sacred values" in decision theory? Paying money a person money can make them less likely to accept an offer?

But that isn't even everything because a mating dance is more complex than simply providing enjoyment or time or any such metric.

I believe I'm simply using a more general definition of price and you're using a stricter definition so the argument is mostly semantics.

I think that's unlikely true given the unattributed Churchill quote that you used.

That the model is incomplete is true. But there's no such thing as a complete model; that's the nature of a model.

The problem isn't that it's incomplete but that it's bad because it leads to various mistakes for a person who wants to make good dating decisions. Don't be a hedgehog.

Comment author: FrameBenignly 02 July 2015 09:59:58PM 0 points [-]

I'm not sure how being unable to exchange sacred values for money has anything to do with exchanges of sacred values. I've already explicitly stated I'm not talking about exchanges of money. I also wasn't aware I'd quoted Churchill. If you mean the old story, Churchhill didn't originate it.