You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on There is no such thing as strength: a parody - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: ZoltanBerrigomo 05 July 2015 11:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: eternal_neophyte 06 July 2015 09:59:05AM *  1 point [-]

More objective units of measure

How do you define/determine this?

the obvious causal relationship between visible muscle size and strength

Isn't there an "obvious" causal relationship between brain mass and intelligence?

you bias IQ tests if you repeatedly take them, but you don't do likewise with strength tests

.Above someone remarked that a female weightlifters might have a much more powerful snatch than male powerlifters, due to several strength tests involving specialised skills auxiliary to "general strength". So it seems that you might indeed be able to "bias" (at least some) strength tests.

Lifting weights makes you stronger, therefore strength measures something real--no analogous statement exists about IQ

How about "solving puzzles makes you smarter, therefore IQ measures something real"?

Comment author: ChristianKl 10 July 2015 09:15:56AM 1 point [-]

How about "solving puzzles makes you smarter, therefore IQ measures something real"?

There no good research that suggests that solving puzzles makes you significantly smarter in the same way that lifting weights makes you significantly smarter.

Isn't there an "obvious" causal relationship between brain mass and intelligence?

The fact that women generally have smaller brains than men doesn't mean that they are generally less intelligent in the same way that the fact that women generally have less muscle means that they have less strength.