You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

torekp comments on Rationality Reading Group: Part D: Mysterious Answers - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: Gram_Stone 02 July 2015 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (8)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 01 August 2015 11:42:32PM 1 point [-]

In addition to that, "X is emergent" implies "X doesn't go all the way down". So, wetness is emergent, but energy probably is not. The reason why some people are excited about emergence, I'll wager, is that it lets them resist what I'll call the Cherry Pion fallacy (i.e. "no cherry pie without cherry pions").

Now, that may not be very profound. But it's not completely empty.