You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Crazy Ideas Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

22 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 07 July 2015 09:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (344)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 July 2015 04:36:16PM *  16 points [-]

EVE already works sufficiently like that.

Comment author: SilentCal 08 July 2015 06:06:25PM 2 points [-]

Interesting, never played it. What's the typical structure of dominant alliances?

Comment author: Lumifer 08 July 2015 06:13:13PM 13 points [-]

"The best way to describe running an Eve alliance is like being a CEO of a major multinational company, except nobody gets paid but a shit ton of work still has to get done." :-)

Basically it's weakly hierarchical -- you can't really compel anyone to do anything, but you can set up a system of incentives to persuade people to do what you want. Don't think there's much egalitarianism because a corp needs to function effectively and direct democracy does not scale.

Comment author: SilentCal 08 July 2015 06:55:06PM *  4 points [-]

Holy crap, this really does what I imagined.

ETA: When you first replied, I was afraid that the rules had been implemented and the results weren't that interesting. But reading that AMA makes it clear the results are fascinating.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 July 2015 07:07:36PM 4 points [-]

results are fascinating

Actually, they are even more fascinating :-)

On the other hand, it's all just like real life X-D