You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Thomas comments on Crazy Ideas Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

22 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 07 July 2015 09:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (344)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Thomas 12 July 2015 11:08:24PM 0 points [-]

It's a bargain. Even one billion US$ per day for the bombs, would be like nothing. We are talking about the energy output comparable with all the others (coal, oil, gas, nuclear, hydro ...) combined!

Comment author: passive_fist 12 July 2015 11:49:55PM 2 points [-]

Not necessarily. Plutonium has about 90 TJ/kg energy density. At $500/g, that comes out to about 180 MJ/$, or 2 c/kWh. That's only a bit below half of coal's 4.63 c/kWh. And this is only for the fuel! If you were to go the all-plutonium route, it would probably wind up being more expensive than coal.

High-yield fusion would be another matter.

Comment author: Thomas 13 July 2015 10:51:30AM *  0 points [-]

You have to have fusion. With fision you have to clean too much.

And the OP wanted the fusion as well.