You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

pico comments on A few misconceptions surrounding Roko's basilisk - Less Wrong Discussion

39 Post author: RobbBB 05 October 2015 09:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (125)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 06 October 2015 10:00:22AM 4 points [-]

I think genuinely dangerous ideas are hard to come by though.

Daniel Dennett wrote a book called "Darwin's Dangerous Idea", and when people aren't trying to play down the basilisk (i.e. almost everywhere), people often pride themselves on thinking dangerous thoughts. It's a staple theme of the NRxers and the manosphere. Claiming to be dangerous provides a comfortable universal argument against opponents.

I think there are, in fact, a good many dangerous ideas, not merely ideas claimed to be so by posturers. Off the top of my head:

  • Islamic fundamentalism (see IS/ISIS/ISIL).
  • The mental is physical.
  • God.
  • There is no supernatural.
  • Utilitarianism.
  • Superintelligent AI.
  • How to make nuclear weapons.
  • Atoms.

Ideas like that usually don't pop into the heads of random, uninformed strangers.

They do, all the time, by contagion from the few who come up with them, especially in the Internet age.

Comment author: pico 07 October 2015 03:17:28AM 3 points [-]

Sorry, should have defined dangerous ideas better - I only meant information that would cause a rational person to drastically alter their behavior, and which would be much worse for society as a whole when everyone is told at once about it.