You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam comments on Open Thread, Jul. 13 - Jul. 19, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MrMind 13 July 2015 06:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (297)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam 17 July 2015 11:54:51AM 2 points [-]

If certain phrases "energize" the voters, it seems likely that they will vote for the politician who promises to do it. And if the politician wants to be elected repeatedly, sooner or later he must start doing something that at least resembles the promise.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 21 July 2015 02:57:16AM 6 points [-]

Or if the politician isn't willing to do it, he'll get replaced by someone who is.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 July 2015 02:41:39PM 6 points [-]

A counter-example: the recent Greek referendum X-/

But yes, you make a fair point and so raise an interesting question -- what would be that "something that at least resembles the promise" with respect to the "Death to America" chants?