You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

IlyaShpitser comments on Should you write longer comments? (Statistical analysis of the relationship between comment length and ratings) - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: cleonid 20 July 2015 02:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 20 July 2015 07:20:00PM *  4 points [-]

You cannot use observed dependences in the data to suggest decision changes because p(y | x) is not in general equal to p(y | do(x)).

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 20 July 2015 07:41:39PM 2 points [-]

What should cleonid do instead (if anything)? And even if something is not true in general, could it still be used as an approximation?

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 20 July 2015 08:28:40PM 4 points [-]

Run a trial, or barring that, correct for obvious confounders that affect both post length and post quality (I am sure we can both think of a few right now).

Comment author: ChristianKl 20 July 2015 08:42:49PM 0 points [-]

Run a trial, or barring that, correct for obvious confounders that affect both post length and post quality (I am sure we can both think of a few right now).

Why not be more specific about what confounders should be included or how a trial should look like?

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 20 July 2015 09:09:12PM 0 points [-]

Are you going to pay me to seriously look into this?