You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CellBioGuy comments on I have just donated $10,000 to the Immortality Bus, which was the most rational decision of my life - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: turchin 18 July 2015 01:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 19 July 2015 08:20:45AM *  0 points [-]

That would still make him more likely than if we were picking a president at random from the adult population. I think that's untrue.

Comment author: David_Bolin 19 July 2015 01:04:26PM 10 points [-]

You can pretty easily think of "apocalyptic" scenarios in which Zoltan would end up getting elected in a fairly normal way. Picking a president at random from the adult population would require even more improbable events.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 22 July 2015 03:42:12AM 0 points [-]

I loved this comment, but then realized I may not have understood it - is the apocalyptic scenario one where a bunch of people die, but somehow those remaining tend to be Zoltan supporters?

Comment author: David_Bolin 22 July 2015 04:46:00AM 2 points [-]

I actually meant it more generally, in the sense of highly unusual situations. So gjm's suggested path would count.

But more straightforwardly apocalyptic situations could also work. So a whole bunch of people die, then those remaining become concerned about existential risk -- given what just happened -- and this leads to people becoming convinced Zoltan would be a good idea. This is more likely than a virus that kills non-Zoltan supporters.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 July 2015 10:31:57PM 8 points [-]

I think it's unlikely that someone actively campaigning to be president is less likely than someone who isn't.