= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
VoiceOfRa comments on List of Fully General Counterarguments - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (42)
No, that's a perfectly good argument unless your opponent can provide stronger evidence in the other direction.
Arguments are not resolved by seeing who can pile it higher and deeper. Not everything that is claimed to be evidence is.
If there weak Bayesian evidence for one side of the issue and no evidence for the other side that means in total the issue is undecided and both sides can be true.