You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on Thinking like a Scientist - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: FrameBenignly 19 July 2015 02:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: shminux 19 July 2015 05:44:24PM 3 points [-]

dividing problems into theory and empiricism, specifying your theory exactly then looking for evidence to either confirm or deny the theory, or finding evidence to later form an exact theory.

The main advantage of having this feedback loop is that the deviations from the search for "truth" are self-correcting. Less-than-rational thinking may slow you down, but it will still let you get to a better model of the world eventually. On the other hand, even the most rational thinking without the feedback inevitably results in very inaccurate models.

Basically, the scientific method alone completely trumps rationality alone, though of course you get best results when combining the two.