= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DeVliegendeHollander comments on Thinking like a Scientist - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (25)
There is an IQ prerequisite for that which most students are unable to fulfill.
The lower-IQ version of scientific thinking are the good-oldie, common-sense proverbs and maxims like "measure twice, cut once". They have a problem of being kinda boring and "uncool".
Kipling's poem The Gods of Copybook Headings is a good example what a low-IQ version of scientific thinking could be. I think it was abandoned because it was "uncool" and "boring".