You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DataPacRat comments on Open Thread, Jul. 20 - Jul. 26, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 20 July 2015 06:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (202)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DataPacRat 23 July 2015 09:17:00PM 0 points [-]

Whether that branch is low-probability is, of course, impossible to tell.

Hm... how sure should anyone be of that impossibility? For example, if the number of Everett branches isn't infinite, but merely, say, 10^120, then wouldn't it be hypothetically possible for a worldline that has relatively few other worldlines that are similar enough to interact on the quantum level to have to macroscopicly-observable effects?

I see no reason to update based on this particular incident.

Fair enough.

you should not read the crime / police blotter sections of newspapers.

I don't; the local region has a small enough population that the main newspaper has only a single section to cover all local stories. Unsubscribing from the RSS feed with local crime stories would also unsubscribe me from local politics, events, fluff, and so forth.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 July 2015 09:25:34PM -1 points [-]

merely, say, 10^120

The greatness of LW.

merely 10^120 :-D

I don't

Clearly, you do. I wasn't suggesting wearing blinders not to notice them, I suggested not reading them.